• About
  • Contact
  • Donate
Tuesday, June 9, 2026

No products in the cart.

  • Login
Future of Christendom
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Events
  • Store
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Events
  • Store
No Result
View All Result
Future of Christendom
No Result
View All Result
Home Article
Modern Police, Man-Made Law, and the ‘Common Good’

Book Title

Modern Police, Man-Made Law, and the ‘Common Good’

Brian Sauvé recently seemed to downplay the concern theonomists have with police officers pulling people over for non-evil acts. I don’t know Sauvé’s exact views on this (and, for the record, am thankful for a lot of his work), but I do know the modern police system is antithetical to God’s Law-Word.

The very concept of a body of “law enforcers” raises a question: What laws need enforcing? Biblical law does not require a body of law enforcers because the relatively short list of civil crimes is handled by the people bringing their complaints to local magistrates. Moreover, law enforcement officers are not required to be out on the streets looking for murderers or thieves or kidnappers. Under biblical law, private people are free to arm themselves to protect their families and homes from such miscreants. They are also free to hire security to protect their private businesses.

My pastor, Joel Saint, once said that the reason he would be inclined to call the police if faced with a dangerous villain, is because any righteous action he might take to defend himself or his family would likely by penalized by the state in favor of the criminal’s rights. In such a system, it is better to call the person “assigned” to deal with the bad guys. But such a system favors the criminal. If a people come to rely on a small body of “law enforcement” officers to protect them from evil men, the criminal can have confidence that he simply must do his dirty work before he hears the encroaching sirens. Thankfully, Americans (in some places) are still allowed to exercise some measure of personal protection against evil men.

The root of the police problem in American society is that police officers are tasked with enforcing man-made law. A gargantuan tumor of man-made law creates the need for a growing body of “law enforcers” armed and equipped to force compliance. The forced taxation of the people is often not enough to fund these police officers, so they morph into “revenue officers,” fleecing the people via speeding tickets and other penalties for non-evil acts. In most cases, police officers are not engaged in acts which stop evil actions (murder, rape, kidnapping, etc.). On occasion, police officers do engage murderers or thieves in the act, and they often do great work in those cases, but it is inevitable that normal people will engage such criminals far more often than police officers will. Criminals generally attack soft targets, not armed police officers. Most of the time, police officers are providing a “police presence” (something private security could do), enforcing man-made laws which penalize non-evil acts (traffic regulations, drug laws, probation violations, failure to pay statist fees, etc.), or following up on crimes after the fact.

As it relates to enforcing man-made laws, modern police officers are essentially tasked with meddling in people’s affairs, and they often do find themselves, in the course of “following orders,” in harm’s way. Because of this, American society has created a system which empowers them to oppress and terrorize people for the sake of “officer safety.” This should be expected. If you were asked to use your civil authority to give people a hard time about non-evil actions, and you knew a lot of people would oppose that sort of meddling, wouldn’t you want special protection (also known as “qualified immunity”)?

Vague concepts such as “natural law” and the “common good” are used to justify a system wherein armed state agents can pull people over for non-evil acts, and then force them to pay money for failing to follow man-made regulations (vehicle registration, driver’s licenses, etc.). This is antithetical to biblical law, which calls for justice – the punishment of the evildoer (cf. 1 Pet. 2:14).

God’s wisdom says that to “impose a fine on a righteous man is not good, nor to strike the noble for their uprightness” (Prov. 17:26). And yet many today, including some Reformed pastors influenced by “natural law” theology, seem to suggest otherwise.

Note: This post is an adaptation of an excerpt from the book Seven Statist Sins. Get the book to read the rest.

Tags: police
Previous Post

Reflections on the Saint-Magill Debate and Man-Made Law

Next Post

Instructions From Jeremiah 29 for Living in a Pagan Nation

Chris Hume

Chris Hume

Chris Hume is the host of The Lancaster Patriot Podcast and the author of several books. Like his father and grandfather, Chris is a veteran of the U.S. armed forces. He holds the MA degree in Literature from Clarks Summit University and the MBA degree from Wesley College. Chris currently resides in Lancaster County, with his wife and children.

Related Posts

The Wrong Machine: Power, Structure, and the Failure of Christian Nationalism
Article

The Wrong Machine: Power, Structure, and the Failure of Christian Nationalism

June 5, 2026
Round 8: AI Judges the Saint-Poschwatta Debate on Lancastrian Theonomy
Article

Round 8: AI Judges the Saint-Poschwatta Debate on Lancastrian Theonomy

June 4, 2026
From Tyranny to Speed Limits: Claude Evaluates the Hume-Decker Exchange
Article

From Tyranny to Speed Limits: Claude Evaluates the Hume-Decker Exchange

June 4, 2026
Claude Breaks Down the Saint vs. Berger Theonomy Debate: Part 6 of AI Debate Analysis
Article

Claude Breaks Down the Saint vs. Berger Theonomy Debate: Part 6 of AI Debate Analysis

June 1, 2026
Hume vs. Kizer Put to the Test by Claude: Part 5 of the AI Debate Analysis Series
Article

Hume vs. Kizer Put to the Test by Claude: Part 5 of the AI Debate Analysis Series

June 1, 2026
Saint vs. Magill Dissected by Claude: Round 4 of the AI Debate Analysis
Article

Saint vs. Magill Dissected by Claude: Round 4 of the AI Debate Analysis

May 31, 2026
Next Post
Instructions From Jeremiah 29 for Living in a Pagan Nation

Instructions From Jeremiah 29 for Living in a Pagan Nation

Popular Post

  • Doug Wilson’s Co-Opting of Christian Nationalism

    Doug Wilson’s Co-Opting of Christian Nationalism

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Divergence Between Theonomy and Christian Nationalism

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Two Theonomic Perspectives on ‘General Equity’

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Sojourner Is My Neighbor: A Biblical Case Against Statist Immigration Control

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Regulative Principle of Government

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Sign Up for E-Mail Updates

About Us

Future of Christendom is located in southeastern Pennsylvania. Our goal is to promote the Lordship of Christ and the Law-Word of God in all realms of society.

  • Book a Speaker
  • Coalition
  • Literature Distribution Outreach
  • Churches
  • Theonomic Court
  • Resources on Lancastrian Theonomy
  • Book a Speaker
  • Coalition
  • Literature Distribution Outreach
  • Churches
  • Theonomic Court
  • Resources on Lancastrian Theonomy

© 2025 Future of Christendom

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Articles
  • Shop
  • Events

© 2026 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.